When the articular cartilage surrounding the ball and socket of your hip joint (where the femur meets the pelvis) is damaged beyond repair, most often due to osteoarthritis (or degenerative joint disease), hip replacement surgery seeks to remove the damaged portion of the hip and replace it with an artificial component.

A total hip replacement (or total hip arthroplasty) involves six main steps:

1. Preparation of the Hip Socket – The damaged cartilage, as well as a small amount of the bone, is removed from the hip socket (acetabulum) and the new surface is shaped to fit the designated implant.
2. Preparation of the Femur – The ball at the end of the femur, along with the damaged cartilage, is removed and the hollow center of the femur is reamed to fit the designated femoral stem implant.
3. Positioning of Hip Socket Implant – A cup-shaped metal implant is positioned in the hip socket. It can be secured with screws or press-fit into place.
4. Positioning of Femoral Stem Implant – A metal stem is inserted into the femur bone to a depth of around 6 inches. It can be cemented or press-fit into place.
5. Positioning of Femoral Head – A metal or ceramic ball is positioned on top of the femoral stem, taking the place of the damaged end of the femur, which was removed. 
6. Spacing – A plastic spacer is inserted into the hip socket implant, creating a smooth surface for gliding (acting in place of cartilage for the artificial hip).

The 3 most common approaches are as follows:

• Posterior Approach – Posterior approach (also known as the Moore or Southern approach) is the most traditional approach to hip replacement. It involves an incision from the back of the hip joint.
• Anterolateral Approach – Anterolateral approach (also known as the Watson-Jones approach) involves accessing the hip from the side.
• Anterior Approach – Anterior approach (also known as the Smith-Petersen approach or Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)) involves accessing the hip from the front.

• Most patients will stay 2-4 days in the hospital and then begin physical therapy (either with a physical therapist coming to their home or in outpatient physical therapy sessions). Physical therapy progresses from walking with a walker to walking with a cane over the course of 2-3 weeks. Post-operative pain management will be provided through medication and/or injections, but most patients are pain free 2-3 weeks after surgery.
• After hip replacement surgery, you can reasonably expect to return to work in an office setting within 2-3 weeks, routine activities like driving within a month, work in an industrial setting involving heavy lifting within 2-3 months, and leisure activities such as golfing and swimming within 3 months.
• After recovering from hip replacement, you can expect to live a normal lifestyle, including activities like walking, hiking, biking, hunting, and fishing.  Most total hip replacement patients experience a significant reduction in pain as well as a vastly increased ability to perform daily activities.

When the articular cartilage surrounding your ankle joint (where the tibia meets the talus) is damaged beyond repair, most often due to arthritis that has occurred as a result of the previous injury to the ankle joint, ankle replacement surgery seeks to remove the damaged portion of the ankle joint and replace it with an artificial component to increase range of motion and alleviate ankle pain.

A total ankle replacement (or total ankle arthroplasty) involves 5 main steps:

1. Preparation of the Tibia – The damaged cartilage, as well as a small amount of the bone, is removed from the bottom of your shin bone (tibia) and the new surface is shaped to fit the designated implant.
2. Preparation of the Talus – The damaged cartilage, as well as a small amount of the bone, is removed from the top of your ankle bone (talus) and the new surface is shaped to fit the designated implant.
3. Positioning of Tibia Implant – A metal implant is positioned on the cut end of the tibia and cemented into place.
4. Positioning of Talus Implant – A metal implant is positioned on the cut end of the talus and cemented into place.
5. Spacing – A plastic spacer is inserted between the two metal implants to provide a smooth gliding surface, acting in place of cartilage for the artificial ankle.

No. Because BMAC injections are considered investigational for orthopedic applications, most insurance companies will not cover the cost. Please contact our office to discuss cash payment options. 

1. Fu, Tsai-Sheng, et al, Enhancement of Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion Using Low-Dose rhBMP-2 and Cultured Marrow Stromal Cells, Journal of Orthopaedic Research March 2009, 380-4.
2. Centeno, Christopher, et al, Regeneration of meniscus cartilage in a knee treated with percutaneously implanted autologous mesenchymal stem cells, Medical Hypotheses (2008) 71, 900–908.
3. Kovacevic BS, David et al, Biological Augmentation of Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair, Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 466:622–633.
4. Rotini, Roberto et al, New perspectives in rotator cuff tendon regeneration: review of tissue engineered therapies, Chir Organi Mov (2008) 91:87–92.
5. Tow B., et al, Disc Regeneration: A Glimpse of the Future, 2007 The Congress of 128 Neurological Surgeons.
6. Chen, Faye, et al, Technology Insight: adult stem cells in cartilage regeneration and tissue engineering, NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE RHEUMATOLOGY, JULY 2006 VOL 2 NO 7, 373-382.
7. Zantop, Thore et al, Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds Are Repopulated by Bone Marrow-Derived Cells in a Mouse Model of Achilles Tendon Reconstruction, Journal of Orthopaedic Research June 2006, 1299-1309.
8. Acosta F., Lotz J., Ames C., et al, The potential role of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration: a critical overview, Neurosurg Focus 19 (3):E4, 2005.
9. Baksh D., et al, Adult mesenchymal stem cells: characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy, J. Cell. Mol. Med. Vol 8, No 3, 2004 pp. 301-316.
10. Crevesten G., et al, Intervertebral Disc Cell Therapy for Regeneration: Mesenchymal Stem Cell Implantation in Rat Intervertebral Discs, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 3, March 2004 pp. 430–434.
11. Hicok, K. C., et al, Human adipose-derived adult stem cells produce osteoid in vivo, Tissue Engineering, Vol. 10(3-4), 371-80, 2004.
12. Javazon, E., Mesenchymal stem cells paradoxes of passaging, Expiremental Hematology, 32(5)- 414-25, 2004.
13. Loening, A. M., et al, AMIDE: A Free Software Tool for Multimodality Medical Image Analysis, Molecular Imaging, Vol. 2(3), 131-7, 2003.
14. Heck J., et al, A Classification System for the Assessment of Lumbar Pain in Athletes, Journal of Athletic Training 2000;35(2):204–211.
15. Kraus, K., Critically sized osteo-periosteal femoral defects: a dog model, Journal of Investigative Surgery, Vol. 12(2), 115-24, 1999.
16. Hernigou, Philippe et al, Abnormalities in the Bone Marrow of the Iliac Crest in Patients Who Have Osteonecrosis Secondary to Corticosteroid Therapy or Alcohol Abuse, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1047-53.
17. Nakajima MD, Takashi, et al, Evaluation of Posterolateral Spinal Fusion Using Mesenchymal Stem Cells, SPINE Volume 32, Number 22, pp 2432–2436.